In a shocking revelation, it has come to light that Moderna, the Cambridge-based biotechnology company, had already developed prototype mRNA (modRNA) “vaccines” for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) before the global pandemic even began. Newly leaked documents show that Moderna sent these prototype vials to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) several weeks prior to the announcement of COVID-19. This information raises questions about the timeline and knowledge surrounding the emergence of the virus.
The material transfer agreement for these prototype vaccines was signed by Prof. Ralph Baric from UNC on December 12, 2019, followed by signatures from representatives of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), a federal agency headed by Tony Fauci at that time. The final signatories were from Moderna itself. It is important to note that all these signatures were made before the World Health Organization (WHO) became aware of the alleged cluster of viral pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China, on December 31, 2019.
This revelation has sparked controversy and accusations of criminality. How did Moderna know in advance that it needed to develop a vaccine for a virus that had not yet been officially identified? Moreover, it raises doubts about the nature of the alleged coronavirus crisis itself. Critics argue that there is still no concrete evidence that a real coronavirus posed a significant threat to humanity in 2020 or 2021.
The testing and vaccines themselves have also come under scrutiny. Faulty PCR tests, which were tuned to a high cycle rate, created an artificial perception of a coronavirus crisis. Additionally, SARS-CoV-2, the virus allegedly responsible for COVID-19, has never been isolated using Koch's postulates, casting doubt on its very existence. This raises concerns about the accuracy of the testing and the true severity of the pandemic.
The implications of these revelations are far-reaching. Many are demanding answers from Moderna and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Calls for legal action are growing as more damning information comes to light. The COVID house of cards seems to be on the brink of collapse, and there may be no way to stop it anymore.
It is important to note that these claims and controversies have not been definitively proven or disproven. They represent a perspective that challenges the mainstream narrative surrounding COVID-19 and vaccine development. As more information emerges, it will be crucial to evaluate and analyze all sides of the story to make informed judgments.
In conclusion, the leaked documents revealing Moderna's development of prototype mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 before the official announcement of the virus have ignited controversy and raised questions about the pandemic's timeline and severity. Critics argue that there is insufficient evidence to support the existence of a real coronavirus threat, while others demand accountability from Moderna and health authorities.
