In the midst of the global pandemic, experimental vaccines were hastily developed and government-funded to combat the virus. However, according to an article on ZeroHedge, these vaccines primarily targeted the elderly and obese individuals, as they were more susceptible to severe illness and death from COVID-19. The article highlights that there was a strong push by governments worldwide to coerce billions of people into getting vaccinated.
The author also criticizes the implementation of lockdown measures in various countries. For instance, New Zealand reportedly built internment camps for individuals who tested positive for COVID-19, while China took extreme measures such as welding apartment buildings shut to trap people inside. The article argues that these actions were unnecessary and disproportionate to the threat posed by the virus.
Furthermore, the author claims that the vaccines did not work as advertised. They cite a tweet from health officials that changed the definition of “vaccine” multiple times, suggesting that the effectiveness of the vaccines was being misrepresented. The article then highlights a recent interview between Tucker Carlson and Dr. Pierre Kory, a critical care specialist and vocal critic of vaccines. The interview covered topics such as vaccine safety and efficacy, excess mortality, demographic impacts of the virus, big pharma, and the professional challenges faced by Kory for speaking out.
Dr. Kory discussed the cost of vaccines, pointing to a rise in excess mortality during the vaccination rollout. He also questioned why those who claimed the vaccines were safe and effective were not being held criminally liable for the deaths caused by them. Additionally, Dr. Kory highlighted the increase in vaccine side effects among younger and healthier individuals, particularly those in white-collar jobs.
The article also touches on the pharmaceutical industry's fear of Vitamin D, which has shown effectiveness against COVID-19 in studies. It suggests that Big Pharma is threatened by Vitamin D because it undermines the disease model and potentially reduces reliance on pharmaceutical interventions.
The professional costs of speaking out against vaccine safety are addressed in the article. Dr. Kory shared his experiences of job loss and censorship, emphasizing the challenges faced by those advocating for a more nuanced understanding of vaccine safety. He also mentioned a book he wrote called “The War on Ivermectin,” which explores the parallels between the suppression of Ivermectin and Vitamin D.
The article then delves into the issue of money and its influence on scientific research. Dr. Kory criticized medical journals for rejecting trials on Ivermectin and publishing studies that manipulated and corrupted data to discredit the drug's effectiveness. This manipulation, according to Dr. Kory, has eroded trust in scientific institutions.
Finally, the article discusses vaccine injuries and Dr. Kory's clinical experience with them. He differentiates between single organ problems caused by vaccines, such as pericarditis or stroke, and a condition he refers to as “long Covid long vaxx.” Dr. Kory suggests that the spike protein from the vaccine triggers this condition, which is similar to long Covid but with potentially more severe symptoms.
In conclusion, this article raises concerns about the development, implementation, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines. It highlights the controversy surrounding vaccine safety and efficacy, the disproportionate response to the virus through lockdown measures, and the potential suppression of alternative treatments like Ivermectin and Vitamin D. The article also sheds light on the professional challenges faced by those who question the mainstream narrative on vaccines. Overall, it presents a critical perspective on the global response to the pandemic and calls into question the motives behind certain actions taken by governments and pharmaceutical companies.