In a groundbreaking new study published in Cureus, epidemiologist M. Nathaniel Mead, along with research scientists Dr. Stephanie Seneff and Dr. Jessica Rose, and senior author Dr. Robert McCullough, sheds light on the truth behind the COVID-19 clinical trials and the global vaccination campaign. Their findings reveal shocking revelations that question the integrity of the trials and raise concerns about the mass rollout of the experimental COVID-19 vaccines.
The lead author, M. Nathaniel Mead, was driven to investigate the vaccines after witnessing the tragic deaths of friends who developed cancer shortly after receiving their injections. He was appalled by what he discovered. The clinical trials were a sham, and public and health officials were unknowingly promoting the shots without understanding their true basis. Mead even went as far as to describe the situation as “criminal.”
One alarming revelation from the study is the premature termination of the trials, which resulted in the manipulation of data and the disappearance of a control group. The placebo group was coerced into getting the COVID-19 shots, negating their role as a control group and compromising the integrity of the trial. This manipulation skewed the statistical figures and created a false narrative that anti-vaxxers were putting lives at risk by contracting COVID-19.
Furthermore, the study exposes how Pfizer attempted to suppress its data from being exposed for 75 years, only to be thwarted by a judge who ordered its release through a Freedom of Information Act request. Through meticulous examination of these documents, Mead and his team uncovered the vaccine's lack of efficacy and the fraudulent nature of the clinical trials.
The authors also found a disturbing increase in autoimmune diseases among those who received the mRNA injections compared to influenza vaccines. This raises serious concerns about the long-term effects of these experimental vaccines on individuals' immune systems.
Perhaps most concerning is the revelation that multiple booster injections may actually contribute to immune dysfunction, making individuals more susceptible to COVID-19 infections with each subsequent dose. This contradicts the narrative that booster shots are necessary for maintaining protection against the virus.
The study concludes with a scathing criticism of the rushed trials and the subsequent adverse effects of the vaccines. The authors argue that the usual safety testing protocols and toxicology requirements were bypassed, preventing a thorough evaluation of potential serious adverse events (SAEs). As a result, numerous cardiovascular, neurological, reproductive, hematological, malignant, and autoimmune SAEs have been identified and published in peer-reviewed medical literature.
It is evident from this study that there are significant concerns surrounding the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines and the way they were tested and rolled out. The authors urge readers to question the narrative and critically evaluate the information presented to them. It is clear that more research and transparency are needed to fully understand the risks and benefits of these vaccines.
In conclusion, this study shines a light on the questionable practices surrounding the COVID-19 clinical trials and vaccination campaign. It raises serious concerns about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, as well as the potential long-term consequences on individuals' health. As more information comes to light, it is crucial for individuals to remain informed and make decisions based on comprehensive and unbiased research.
