I have written a highly significant article outlining a method for anyone to use in order to prove that vaccines can potentially cause premature death in individuals of any age.
Halting the COVID vaccines is necessary because an unbiased analysis of death data, including age and date of death as well as date of last COVID vaccination, demonstrates conclusively that the vaccines are reducing lifespans.
The message suggests that health authorities worldwide are keeping their data secret because it would reveal that millions of people are being killed by governments. The author believes this to be the truth and feels that governments will either try to censor the article or create fear and doubt by questioning the bias of the survey without providing evidence. However, there are no specific details or facts provided to support these claims.
I want others to review my analysis for any mistakes. Prior to writing my article, I spoke with UK Professor Norman Fenton and Edward Dowd. Fenton confirmed that there were no flaws in my methodology and we discussed the potential bias in the data, which should favor the vaccinated group. However, the results showed the opposite, indicating that something is amiss and cannot be explained.
It seems likely that the mainstream press and medical community may disregard this article. However, the longer they choose to ignore it, the greater the potential consequences for them. It's important to remember that when you find yourself in a difficult situation, it's best to stop making it worse.
If there is no mistake in how I conducted the survey or if someone can provide a clear explanation of how surveying only “my followers” could skew the sample in favor of vaccinated individuals, then there is no more room for debate.
It should have been easy for the CDC to produce an analysis using statewide data if they believe that vaccines are safe. However, they did not do so which raises the question why. This might be because they are aware that such an analysis could contradict the established narrative.
To prove me wrong, we can obtain and share public statewide data from all states including age, date of death, and date of the last COVID vaccine. This does not violate HIPAA regulations or the privacy of deceased individuals as no Personally Identifiable Information (PII) will be disclosed.
States may not release data about the vaccinations and deaths because they fear the consequences. Some may refute survey results as biased, but readers cannot control the timing of their friends' vaccinations or deaths, so there is no clear explanation for any bias.
It is possible that my readers have a higher income and intelligence level than the average American, which could create a bias in the survey results. However, if the vaccine is causing harm to affluent and intelligent individuals, then we have a serious issue that must be addressed as a priority. Therefore, we should consider this as an important factor that needs to be taken into account.
It is possible to suggest that my readers are not as intelligent as others. However, continuing to use this as a metric for surveying is unethical unless the intention is to selectively remove members of society. To address any concerns regarding the bias of the survey, it can be easily replicated and verified by others, including reputable news sources like The New York Times.
They will not do it, which reveals all the necessary information, right?
To engage in a productive argument about this article, it is necessary for the opposing party to present their own data instead of making unfounded arguments to cause fear, uncertainty, and doubt.
We have won the game, and you can no longer hide from the truth.
