Groundbreaking research reveals that those who receive more vaccinations are more inclined to contract COVID-19 than those with fewer jabs. Lies circulate, yet the truth cannot be hidden – countless have perished due to this deception.
In December of 2022, Cleveland Clinic conducted a study which investigated 51,011 workers in the clinic who had different vaccination statuses. Results showed that those with more doses were much more likely to contract COVID-19 than people who received fewer shots. Figure 2 from this research is provided below for reference.
To ensure equitable access, the countdown began for everyone simultaneously at the same time on the day when the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine became available to employees.
As demonstrated, those who have received multiple vaccine shots were more likely to contract COVID as compared to the others – a statistically significant difference.
Attempts to debunk the study
The pro-vaccine faction loathes this study because it opposes their narrative. If the research had actually validated their argument, they would be lauding it instead of scrutinizing it.
Instead of analyzing the data or pointing out a mistake, Eugene Gu noted that it wasn't peer-reviewed – which is common. He then highlighted how this makes publishing in journals unlikely.
Debunk the Funk released a YouTube video where he questioned why the start point was chosen and that the y-axis appeared “not huge.” However, it is essential to note that even though his perceived analysis of the graph may be true, there are still significant differences at day 91. To get an authentic understanding of how valid these distinctions actually are, listen carefully to 1:08 in this highly informative video from someone who holds a PhD.
To dispute the findings of this study, Mr. Funk, a comparative analysis must be conducted and evidence presented to illustrate an alternate result. Unfortunately, no such research exists because it contradicts what is generally accepted as true—hence why nobody would consider publishing it in any capacity.
This assessment was impartial and everyone began from the same point. The individuals participating in the testing are employees of Cleveland Clinic – all working-age adults. It reflects a realistic study, since group sizes were enough to determine statistical significance of outcomes.
Despite the vehement protests from pro-vaxxers, there is simply no argument that can counter the claims made in “Debunk the Funk's video.
And, he declared that the study was not properly designed. Incredible! So, what specific DESIGN FLAW needed to be improved for Figure 2's sake? Sadly, this wasn't mentioned by him.
This case study is conducted in a real-world hospital setting and there's nothing more that could be done. Do you agree?