In a shocking turn of events, new data obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request reveals that public health epidemiologists in Santa Clara County had knowledge as early as January 2022 that the COVID vaccines increased the likelihood of contracting the virus. Despite this alarming information, they chose to remain silent, continuing to push for vaccination without any public admission or warning. The mainstream media has also turned a blind eye to this crucial data, raising questions about accountability and transparency.
The data, which can be downloaded here, is from January 2022 and includes a line for each person diagnosed with COVID during that month. The spreadsheet uses “N” to represent unvaccinated individuals, “Y” for vaccinated individuals, “U” for unknown vaccination status, and blank for missing information. With a highly vaccinated population of 95% in Santa Clara County, it is surprising to discover that the percentage of people diagnosed with COVID (98% or more) was higher than the percentage of vaccinated individuals (less than 95%).
This revelation challenges the widely touted claim that vaccines reduce the risk of infection by 10 times, as observed in clinical trials. Instead, the data suggests that the vaccines actually made individuals more susceptible to contracting COVID. This finding aligns with similar discoveries in Australia and adds weight to the argument that vaccine trials may have been fraudulent, employing deceptive tactics to exaggerate efficacy rates. The Cleveland Clinic study and other sources have also highlighted this discrepancy.
The statistical significance of these numbers cannot be ignored. It appears that the Santa Clara County Health epidemiologists were aware of this issue by January 2022 but chose to withhold the information from the public. Their silence raises concerns about their responsibility and accountability in potentially harming individuals with ineffective and even dangerous vaccines. Unfortunately, it seems unlikely that there will ever be any public admission or accountability for these actions, as public officials often shy away from admitting their mistakes.
Attempts to solicit a response from the Santa Clara County Health Department regarding these revelations have been met with silence. Multiple phone calls and emails seeking clarification and comment on the matter have been ignored. This lack of engagement further deepens the sense of secrecy surrounding the issue.
As the public digests this new information, it is essential to demand transparency and accountability from public health officials. The data obtained through the FOIA request challenges the narrative surrounding COVID vaccines and raises significant concerns about their effectiveness. It is crucial for the public to be fully informed and empowered to make decisions about their health based on accurate and unbiased information.
In conclusion, the revelations from Santa Clara County shed light on a troubling aspect of COVID vaccination. The data indicates that vaccines may have increased the risk of contracting the virus, contradicting claims made during clinical trials. The silence of public health officials and the lack of media coverage on this matter raise questions about accountability and transparency.
