In a shocking turn of events, a judge with ties to Pfizer has blocked a legal challenge over Moderna's and Pfizer's mRNA Covid vaccines. The challenge aimed to raise concerns about the alleged presence of unregulated genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and high levels of DNA contamination in the vaccine vials. This development has raised questions about the transparency and safety of these vaccines.
The dismissal of the lawsuit is a disgrace, as it undermines the efforts of those trying to ensure the safety of the vaccines. It also raises concerns about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on legal proceedings.
Another noteworthy event is the testimony of Dr. Lataster from Sydney University at US Senator Ron Johnson's Covid hearing. The 10-minute video of his testimony is a must-watch for anyone interested in understanding the true impact of the Covid vaccines. Dr. Lataster provides valuable insights into the potential long-term effects and risks associated with these vaccines.
One concerning narrative that has emerged recently is the concept of “Long Covid.” This term is being used to explain the lingering effects experienced by some individuals after contracting Covid-19. However, there are doubts about the validity of this concept, with some experts considering it to be inaccurate.
The fundamental issue with the Covid vaccines is their ability to produce the toxic Spike Protein, similar to that of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In some individuals, the Spike Protein can continue to be produced for months after vaccination. Any research or paper that fails to acknowledge this fact as a probable mechanism of “Long Covid” is questionable and unreliable.
To further explore the topic of “Long Covid,” a review of 400 published papers on the subject is attached. This comprehensive review sheds light on the various perspectives and theories surrounding “Long Covid.”
Additionally, a paper is provided that challenges the notion that the high incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis following Covid-19 vaccination can be attributed to “Long Covid.” This paper suggests that the blame should be placed on the vaccines themselves, rather than the lingering effects of Covid-19.
In an interesting development, an Australian study recommends discontinuing the use of the term “Long Covid.” The study, which analyzed 5,112 individuals infected with Covid-19, found that only 3 percent experienced moderate to severe lingering effects a year later. This is fewer than the reported effects of other mild respiratory diseases. The study suggests that there is nothing unique or exceptional about Covid-19 in terms of long-term effects.
By dismissing the alarming number of post-vaccination injuries using narratives like “Long Covid,” we are engaging in quack medicine and junk science. It is crucial to acknowledge and address the serious concerns surrounding these vaccines instead of brushing them aside.
In conclusion, the dismissal of the legal challenge over the Covid vaccines raises concerns about the transparency and safety of these vaccines. The concept of “Long Covid” is being questioned, and there is a need for further research and understanding of the potential long-term effects of the vaccines. It is crucial to have open and honest discussions about these issues to ensure the well-being of the public.
